Skip to main content
Rubrik logo
RBRK.NYSE
Rubrik
Technology · Software - Infrastructure

Cybersecurity and data resilience company providing backup, recovery, threat analytics, and cloud data protection software.

HQ: United StatesListed: United States

AI Consensus

On this page, you will be able to compare multi-agent consensus ratings, forecast paths, AI price targets, expected return, fundamentals, analyst disagreement, risks, and the investment thesis across short- and long-term horizons.

AI Consensus Investment Thesis

Rubrik (RBRK) Stock Forecast and AI Rating

Deep analysis published Returns refreshed
1-Year and 5-Year Forecast Outlook

Forecast targets and rating

Final recommendation

No Action - Keep Monitoring

One horizon is weak; wait for clearer confirmation.

2027

1-Year

PARTIALLY SELL

$94

-2.7%
2031

5-Year

NEUTRAL

$178

+83.8%

Latest flagship insight

Why Institutional Investors Are Quietly Accumulating This Hidden Cash Flow Compounder

High consensus across reports reveals a structural transition from an unprofitable software vendor to a self-funding cyber-resilience utility. While restrictive monetary policy compresses valuation multiples, escalating geopolitical cyber threats and autonomous agent security drive inelastic demand, transforming negative accounting optics into a highly resilient, compounding cash-flow engine.

LATEST PUBLISHED DEEP ANALYSIS BY iPULSE AI ENGINE

This is the latest published deep-analysis batch. Audit previous forecasts in full transparency

Warren Buffett (Value Purist) advisor portraitSuperintelligence (Anthropologist) advisor portraitRay Dalio (Strategist) advisor portraitMachiavelli (Insider) advisor portraitElon Musk (Visionary) advisor portraitMichael Burry (Vulture) advisor portraitJ.P. Morgan (Titan) advisor portraitSherlock Holmes (Whistleblower) advisor portrait

Warren Buffett (Value Purist), Superintelligence (Anthropologist), Ray Dalio (Strategist), Machiavelli (Insider), Elon Musk (Visionary), Michael Burry (Vulture), J.P. Morgan (Titan), Sherlock Holmes (Whistleblower). Some archetypes run in multiple modes, resulting in 12 advisors total.

Research support only. We don't give financial advice.

Computed on these frontier AI models
Gemini AI model logoGeminiClaude AI model logoClaudeChatGPT AI model logoChatGPTGrok AI model logoGrok

Executive Summary

Dotted terms open concise definitions. Browse technical terms

Expert Language
Explained Simply

Interactive forecast chart

Figure: Five-year interactive consensus forecast for Rubrik, including the advisor-disagreement range and benchmark comparison. Sign in, verify your email, and use the required subscription to explore the chart.

The core investment thesis centers on the structural divergence between reported GAAP net losses and a powerful inflection. As enterprise networks transition to autonomous, architectures, traditional perimeter security becomes obsolete, elevating native cryptographic data immutability to a non-discretionary operational requirement. Despite risks from a restrictive , the asset's elite eighty percent and self-funding capacity provide a robust . The transition from a high-growth cash burner to an entrenched, cash-compounding node in global data security topology is heavily supported by , making it a highly resilient asset in a volatile macroeconomic environment.

Key insights

  • Rapid acceleration to a nineteen percent margin proves immense and self-funding capability.
  • Geopolitical cyber-warfare escalation drives highly for zero-trust data resilience across public and private sectors.
  • High and secure an elite rate, protecting the core subscription base.
  • Massive stock-based compensation remains a persistent dilutive drag on per-share value, delaying GAAP net income profitability.
  • Hyperscaler native tool bundling and aggressive pricing retaliation from legacy incumbents present down-market pricing friction.
  • Valuation multiples face persistent gravitational pressure from structurally elevated real interest rates and capital rotation into mega-IPOs.
Protected research workspace
AI Consensus
AI Forecasts
Company Profile

Alpha Gap & Repricing Catalysts

Where does the current market narrative diverge from our AI Forecasts—and what could close the gap?

Market Narrative

What does the market currently expect? The crowd currently views the asset as a premium-priced, high-growth cloud backup vendor riding the wave of enterprise ransomware fears. Media and sell-side analysts anchor heavily on its rapid top-line revenue growth and unanimous positive ratings, treating its lack of as a standard, temporary operational phase. The dominant consensus trade assumes the company will steadily capture from legacy competitors, yet remains highly vulnerable to macroeconomic rate hikes and tightening IT budgets. The anchoring bias is treating the asset strictly as a discretionary disaster recovery play rather than a critical, non-discretionary component of .

Alpha Gap

What is the biggest difference between market expectations and our AI forecasts? The market systematically misprices the asset as a discretionary software application rather than critical data infrastructure. The is that as scale, the ability to roll back poisoned data, preserve exact execution states, and secure model weights becomes mandatory for AI deployment, transitioning the asset from a backup utility to an AI data governance engine. Furthermore, the crowd fixates on negative GAAP margins while ignoring a spectacular inflection, which has reached over three hundred million dollars trailing. This self-funding cash profile insulates the asset from expensive credit markets, creating a massive information gap between backward-looking GAAP optics and forward-looking cash compounding.

Repricing Catalyst

What could make the market recognize and close that gap? The convergence catalyst will be forced by consecutive quarterly earnings reports demonstrating expanding and outright , stripping away the unprofitable tech stigma. Additionally, the explicit decoupling of AI-security revenue from legacy backup in disclosures, alongside the formalization of federal procurement mandates requiring zero-trust architectures, will compel the market to re-rate the asset. This shift from a commoditized backup multiple to a frontier multiple is expected to formalize over the next twelve to eighteen months.

Sentiment and Timing

What do sentiment, volatility, and the market-recognition cycle suggest about the thesis timing?

Greed / Fear
Mixed
Volatility
High Erratic
Cycle position
Growing Awareness

While there is strong consensus that the asset is in a growing awareness phase, sentiment views diverge. Some perspectives emphasize fear and high volatility due to macroeconomic rate pressures and stock-based , while others exhibit greed, focusing on the massive inflection and geopolitical tailwinds.

Macro Regime Fit

Does the current market environment support the thesis? The macrofinancial regime presents a bifurcated setup. The restrictive monetary environment of higher real rates and tight liquidity acts as a persistent headwind, compressing valuation multiples for high-duration software equities. Conversely, the geopolitical regime—characterized by escalating state-sponsored cyber warfare and data-fencing mandates—acts as an overwhelming tailwind. Because the asset's rapid generation immunizes its from expensive credit markets, the fundamental geopolitical demand tailwind dominates, rendering the overall setup highly supportive.

Advisor Disagreement

What do our AI Advisors disagree about most? The primary disagreement across reports centers on the 's sensitivity to macroeconomic rates versus fundamental growth velocity. Some perspectives argue that structurally high real interest rates will inevitably compress the price-to-sales multiple, capping absolute returns. Others contend that the explosive inflection and inelastic geopolitical demand will easily overpower multiple contraction. Additionally, there is minor disagreement regarding the near-term competitive threat posed by legacy vendor mergers and the exact timeline for achieving GAAP net income profitability.

Base-Case Forces

Near-certain positive forces

Top Drivers / Tailwinds

Near-certain forces that support the investment thesis. These forces are treated as part of the base case (more than 60% probability of occurrence). Impact columns are specific to this asset class.

Scroll to view all columns

Top Drivers / Tailwinds with asset-specific estimated impacts and thesis rationale
Driver / TailwindCategoryEst. stock-price impactEst. earnings impactWhy it matters
Geopolitical Cyber-Warfare Demand ShockPolitical And Geopolitical+45%+50%Escalating state-sponsored cyber retaliation and kinetic conflicts force sovereign and enterprise buyers to elevate zero-trust data resilience to a national security mandate. The asset's immutable, append-only file system guarantees state preservation when perimeters fail, driving highly and sustained subscription revenue growth.
Operational Efficiency+35%+45%The asset has executed a structural inflection, swinging to a robust positive of nearly twenty percent. This self-funding capability uncouples the company from expensive credit markets, protecting its and allowing organic compounding independent of external capital constraints.
AI Data Governance Innovation And Product+25%+25%The rapid deployment of and retrieval-augmented generation pipelines requires pristine data integrity. By securing enterprise AI data pipelines against poisoning and corruption, the asset transitions from a legacy backup utility to a critical node, unlocking lucrative upsell pathways.
and Competitive Positioning+20%+20%Moving petabytes of mission-critical enterprise data across environments incurs massive operational risks and egress fees. Once integrated, the asset's zero-trust architecture creates prohibitive , securing an elite rate and protecting long-term .

Near-certain negative forces

Top Frictions / Headwinds

Near-certain forces that could slow, cap, or damage the thesis. These forces are treated as part of the base case (more than 60% probability of occurrence). Impact columns are specific to this asset class.

Scroll to view all columns

Top Frictions / Headwinds with asset-specific estimated impacts and thesis rationale
Friction / HeadwindCategoryEst. stock-price impactEst. earnings impactWhy it matters
Restrictive Monetary Macroeconomic And Macrofinancial-25%-5.0%Structurally elevated real interest rates and tight liquidity under the hawkish central bank regime act as a persistent gravitational drag on high-multiple software valuations. This macro-financial friction compresses the multiples of long-duration assets, capping absolute price appreciation.
Management And Governance-20%-15%Aggressive reliance on stock-based compensation to attract and retain engineering talent dilutes the public equity base and delays the timeline to . This structural acts as a persistent drag on per-share value creation, offsetting top-line growth benefits.
Hyperscaler Native Tool BundlingCompetitive Positioning-15%-15%Cloud continually expand and bundle native, 'good enough' backup and security tools within their base infrastructure packages. This aggressive bundling strategy exerts downward pricing pressure down-market, forcing the asset to continually spend on R&D to maintain its technological lead.
Enterprise IT Budget CrowdingSector And Industry-10%-10%The massive dedicated to physical AI hardware and compute infrastructure is cannibalizing traditional enterprise software budgets. This crowding effect threatens to elongate sales cycles and slow net new growth as organizations triage finite capital.

What Could Break or Accelerate the Thesis

Plausible downside scenarios

Tail Risks

Tail yet plausible downside scenarios selected for their highest potential impact.

Scroll to view all columns

Tail risks with plausibility, asset-specific potential impact, exposure category, and scenario rationale
Tail scenarioChance of OccurringStock Price ImpactExposure categoryWhy plausible / what changes
Catastrophic Core Platform Breach10%-55%Competitive PositioningA highly sophisticated zero-day exploit or state-sponsored attack could successfully compromise the asset's core immutable file system, resulting in unrecoverable data loss. Because the entire brand equity is predicated on absolute data survivability, a breach would instantly destroy customer trust, triggering catastrophic churn.
Severe Global IT Recession25%-35%Macroeconomic And MacrofinancialA prolonged could force widespread corporate layoffs and a severe contraction in enterprise IT budgets. If organizations freeze all net-new software deployments, the asset's land-and-expand growth algorithm would stall, exposing its to a brutal downward repricing.

Plausible upside scenarios

Tail Opportunities

Tail yet plausible upside scenarios selected for their highest potential impact.

Scroll to view all columns

Tail opportunities with plausibility, asset-specific potential impact, exposure category, and scenario rationale
Tail scenarioChance of OccurringStock Price ImpactExposure categoryWhy plausible / what changes
Mandates35%+35%RegulatoryGlobal governments could mandate localized, cryptographically immutable zero-trust data vaults for all critical infrastructure and federal contractors. This regulatory shift would bypass commercial budget constraints, granting the asset near-monopoly status in a massive public-sector market and driving rapid acceleration.
Mega-Cap Strategic Acquisition20%+45%Competitive PositioningA cash-rich hyperscaler or legacy networking giant could acquire the company outright to internalize its zero-trust data layer and secure enterprise AI workflows. Given the high strategic value of , an acquisition would command a massive control premium, instantly realizing multi-year forward returns.

Company Financial Analysis

Rubrik Earnings and Financials Analysis by AI

Financial figures available as of Jul 05, 2026. Only filings and source records available by this analysis date are included.

Earnings and financials

The financial reports show a clear split between the company's official accounting losses and its actual cash generation. On one hand, the company is growing rapidly, with revenue jumping over forty-eight percent to reach over one billion dollars. However, official accounting net income remains deeply negative, showing a loss of over three hundred million dollars. This loss is mainly due to non-cash expenses, specifically the large amount of stock given to employees. The exciting news is that the company's free cash flow has turned strongly positive, reaching over three hundred million dollars. All reports agree that this cash flow growth is a massive milestone that makes the company self-funding and safe from expensive debt markets. There is some disagreement on how quickly these cash gains will translate into official accounting profits, but the overall cash trend is incredibly strong and supportive.

Revenue, earnings, and cash flow

The table compares up to five fiscal years of revenue, net income, and free cash flow available to this analysis.

Revenue, net income, and free cash flow history
Fiscal yearRevenueNet incomeFree cash flow
2026USD 1.3BUSD -348.8MUSD 253.3M
2025USD 886.5MUSD -1.2BUSD 31.3M
2024USD 627.9MUSD -354.2MUSD -16.9M
2023USD 599.8MUSD -277.7MUSD -15M
2022USD 506.1MUSD -254.4MUSD -103.2M

Valuation context: historical P/E

The table compares up to five fiscal years of point-in-time valuation evidence available to this analysis.

Historical price-to-earnings ratios
Fiscal yearP/EEarnings basisCurrency basisTicker / reporting
2026--TTMLoss-makingUSD / USD
2025--TTMLoss-makingUSD / USD
2024--TTMUnavailableUSD / USD
2023--AnnualUnavailableUSD / USD
2022--AnnualUnavailableUSD / USD

P/E uses historical market capitalization and earnings known at each period. Cross-currency observations are normalized to USD using point-in-time FX rates.

Profitability and margins

The company's profit margins show incredible underlying strength combined with short-term accounting pressures. Its gross profit margins are outstanding at eighty percent, proving that the company has immense pricing power because businesses view its security services as essential for survival. However, its operating margins are currently negative due to heavy spending on sales, marketing, and employee stock compensation. The reports agree that these negative margins are improving rapidly compared to last year as the company scales up. There is a slight clash in opinions regarding whether the current high valuation multiple is fully justified, but the consensus is that the high gross margins will eventually drive massive operating profits as growth matures. Investors should watch sales and marketing expenses as a key sign that the company is successfully turning its high gross margins into true bottom-line profitability.

The table compares up to five fiscal years of operating income and reported profitability margins.

Operating income and margin history
Fiscal yearOperating incomeOperating marginNet margin
2026USD -345.4M-26.2%-26.5%
2025USD -1.1B-127.9%-130.3%
2024USD -306.5M-48.8%-56.4%
2023USD -261.5M-43.6%-46.3%
2022USD -249.8M-49.4%-50.3%

Balance sheet and leverage

At first glance, the company's balance sheet shows negative shareholder equity, which might worry everyday investors. However, the reports clarify that this is a common accounting quirk for subscription software companies that collect cash upfront before delivering services. In reality, the balance sheet is exceptionally strong and acts as a financial fortress. The company holds over two billion dollars in total assets, has strong short-term liquidity, and carries virtually no traditional debt. Because the business generates over three hundred million dollars in annual free cash flow, it does not need to borrow money in today's high-interest-rate environment. All reports agree that this zero-debt, high-cash profile completely removes refinancing risks and provides excellent protection against economic downturns. It also gives the company the financial power to buy out smaller, struggling competitors.

The table compares up to five fiscal years of debt, liquidity, net cash or debt, and current-ratio evidence.

Balance sheet leverage and liquidity history
Fiscal yearTotal debtCash + short-term investmentsNet cash / (debt)Current ratio
2026USD 1.1BUSD 1.7BUSD 750.5M net debt1.69x
2025USD 350.8MUSD 705.1MUSD 164.5M net debt1.13x
2024USD 309.3MUSD 279.3MUSD 179.3M net debt0.84x
2023USD 216MUSD 295.9MUSD 80.2M net debt1.17x
2022USD 33.2MUSD 138.8MUSD 37.8M net cash0.98x

Net debt below zero is displayed as net cash. Current ratio is current assets divided by current liabilities.

Capex and investment intensity

The company operates an incredibly light investment model, meaning it does not need to spend heavily on physical buildings, factories, or expensive computer hardware. Physical capital expenditures make up a tiny two percent of its revenue. Instead, the company's main investments are in research and development to keep its security software ahead of hackers. All reports agree that this low-spending model is a huge advantage, especially when high interest rates make borrowing expensive. By letting public cloud partners handle the heavy physical infrastructure, the company can focus its cash on software innovation. While investors should keep an eye on the high cost of stock-based compensation used to pay software engineers, the overall consensus is that this capital-light approach allows almost all new revenue to turn directly into free cash flow, greatly strengthening its long-term investment appeal.

The table compares up to five fiscal years of capital expenditure and research-and-development investment.

Capital expenditure and research and development history
Fiscal yearCapital expenditureR&D spend
2026USD 29.6MUSD 373.7M
2025USD 16.9MUSD 531.6M
2024USD 12.3MUSD 189.8M
2023USD 34.3MUSD 158.8M
2022USD 20.4MUSD 159.6M

Quarterly Forecast Scenarios

Rubrik Quarterly Forecast Scenarios

One row per forecast quarter. Asset scenario targets are shown in USD; benchmark values are shown in USD.

Scroll to view all columns

Quarterly Bear Case Stock Price, Base Case Stock Price, Bull Case Stock Price, and S&P 500 benchmark forecasts for Rubrik.
TimelineBear Case Stock Price (USD)Base Case Stock Price (USD)Bull Case Stock Price (USD)S&P 500 benchmark (USD)
$78.62$87.26$93.68$736.09
$76.26$91.72$101.17$724.14
$79.31$93.50$111.29$713.57
$80.90$94.36$105.72$723.38
$79.28$99.97$121.58$716.61
$83.25$106.05$131.31$738.34
$86.58$109.80$147.07$746.91
$85.71$110.63$154.42$771.93
$88.28$113.54$142.07$782.73
$91.81$122.10$167.64$807.31
$96.40$126.87$184.40$822.72
$98.33$129.30$199.15$846.10
$98.33$135.64$223.05$852.53
$104.23$143.27$236.43$882.91
$107.36$145.71$226.98$900.46
$109.51$150.37$261.02$922.67
$107.31$156.63$287.13$935.91
$111.61$165.67$310.10$952.30
$114.96$170.95$331.80$976.28
$117.25$178.15$348.39$1,002

Research Provenance

References & Context

This Rubrik consensus analysis combines structured market evidence with independent AI-agent forecasts. External references below are limited to sources recorded by the researcher agents for this forecast batch.

Primary analysis inputs

Independent AI Advisor panel

AI Advisors
12
AI Researchers
7
AI Thinkers
5

Context retained with this Consensus

The same public-safe market, global-event, and fundamental context supplied to the AI Advisor panel.

03

Global context snapshot

2025 Full-Year Global Market and World-Events Context

Download Archived Snapshot

Coverage 2025-01-01 to 2025-12-31 · Knowledge cutoff 2025-12-31

File size
90.8K bytes
Words
12.8K words
Characters
90.8K characters

This full-year context package covers the principal geopolitical, economic, monetary-policy, technology, trade, energy, and institutional developments that shaped global markets during 2025. It gives the forecasting model a chronological account of major world events together with their likely transmission into growth, inflation, interest rates, supply chains, commodities, currencies, public markets, and sector-level investment conditions.

The package also includes monthly and quarterly macroeconomic and cross-asset reference tables spanning US and international growth, central-bank policy, sovereign yields, major equity indices, foreign exchange, energy, industrial and precious metals, and digital assets. Quarterly and full-year high-impact summaries are integrated; monthly quantitative series remain working values pending final audit, and that qualification is part of the preserved context.

Top 3 market shifts from 2025 Full-Year Global Market and World-Events Context
Top 3 Market Shifts From FileDateStatus
DeepSeek shock and AI economics reset2025-01-27OPEN ENDED TREND
US tariff regime escalation and trade-system rupture2025-02-01ACTIVE POLICY REGIME
Federal Reserve easing cycle after a prolonged hold2025-09-17ACTIVE POLICY REGIME

2026 Year-to-Date Global Market Context through 2026-05-31

Download Archived Snapshot

Coverage 2026-01-01 to 2026-05-31 · Knowledge cutoff 2026-05-31

File size
78K bytes
Words
10.9K words
Characters
78K characters

This year-to-date package described the geopolitical, macroeconomic, monetary-policy, technology, trade, energy, and cross-asset developments available through the batch knowledge cutoff of 2026-05-31.

It supplied dated market and policy context, including rates, sovereign yields, equities, foreign exchange, energy, metals, and digital assets, for the forecast generation workflow.

Top 3 market shifts from 2026 Year-to-Date Global Market Context through 2026-05-31
Top 3 Market Shifts From FileDateStatus
The Iran and Strait of Hormuz conflict shocked energy markets2026-02-28STARTED AND ONGOING
U.S. monetary policy entered the Warsh transition2026-01-30STARTED AND ACTIVE POLICY TRANSITION
Agentic AI and infrastructure spending kept expanding2026-01-01OPEN ENDED
02

Fundamental context

Income statement

34 fields

costOfRevenue · currency_symbol · date · depreciationAndAmortization · +30 more fields

Balance sheet

64 fields

accountsPayable · accumulatedAmortization · accumulatedDepreciation · accumulatedOtherComprehensiveIncome · +60 more fields

Cash flow

32 fields

beginPeriodCashFlow · capitalExpenditures · cashAndCashEquivalentsChanges · cashFlowsOtherOperating · +28 more fields

Outstanding shares

4 fields

date · dateFormatted · shares · sharesMln

annual: 2021-01-31–2026-01-31, 11 periods; quarterly: 2023-07-31–2026-04-30, 12 periods

Currencies cited: USD (quote USD; primary reporting USD; converted/valuation USD).