Skip to main content
Assets
IONQ logo
IONQ.NYSE
IONQ
Information Technology · Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals

Quantum computing company developing trapped ion quantum computers for commercial and research applications.

HQ: United StatesListed: United States

AI Consensus

On this page, you will be able to compare multi-agent consensus ratings, forecast paths, AI price targets, expected return, fundamentals, analyst disagreement, risks, and the investment thesis across short- and long-term horizons.

AI Consensus Investment Thesis

IONQ (IONQ) Stock Forecast and AI Rating

Returns refreshed Deep analysis published 12 min read
1-Year and 5-Year Forecast Outlook

Forecast targets and rating

Final recommendation

PARTIAL SELL

Calculated from the frozen synthesized path using the same return, horizon, volatility and dividend rules as individual opinions.

2027

1-Year

SELL ALL

$32

-18.5%
2031

5-Year

PARTIAL SELL

$35

-11.4%

Latest flagship insight

Acquired Foundry Expansion Conceals Severe Margin Erosion Amid Restrictive Monetary Regimes

Independent analysis reveals high consensus that aggressive foundry acquisitions mask structural gross margin dilution and persistent operating cash burn. While trapped atomic ion fidelity and sovereign defense procurement establish strategic moats, severe duration sensitivity under elevated benchmark yields ensures multiyear multiple compression outweighs nominal consolidated revenue growth.

Deep Forecast Analysis by iPulse AI Engine

This is the latest published deep-analysis batch. Audit published forecasts in full transparency

Warren Buffett (Value Purist) advisor portraitSherlock Holmes (Whistleblower) advisor portraitElon Musk (Visionary) advisor portraitUniversal Investor (Polymath) advisor portraitJ.P. Morgan (Titan) advisor portraitRay Dalio (Strategist) advisor portraitMichael Burry (Vulture) advisor portraitMachiavelli (Insider) advisor portraitSuperintelligence (Anthropologist) advisor portrait

Warren Buffett (Value Purist), Sherlock Holmes (Whistleblower), Elon Musk (Visionary), Universal Investor (Polymath), J.P. Morgan (Titan), Ray Dalio (Strategist), Michael Burry (Vulture), Machiavelli (Insider), Superintelligence (Anthropologist). Some archetypes run in multiple modes, resulting in 14 advisors total.

Computed on these frontier AI models
Gemini AI model logoGeminiClaude AI model logoClaudeChatGPT AI model logoChatGPT

Executive Summary

Dotted terms open concise definitions. Browse technical terms

If you invested $10,000 in IONQ at the forecast anchor (2026-09-18): $8,860 in five years versus $13,892 for S&P 500 benchmark.

Five-year synthesized consensus forecast for IONQThe diagram shows the synthesized consensus value path for IONQ, forecast milestones, and a comparison with S&P 500 benchmark. excluding any dividend yield adjustment.$10,000$15,000$8,860 (-11.4%)$13,892 (+38.9%)Anchor2026-09-182027(1Y)2028(2Y)2029(3Y)2030(4Y)2031(5Y)
IONQ · Synthesized ConsensusS&P 500 benchmark
Figure: Five-year synthesized consensus value path for IONQ compared with S&P 500 benchmark. The path uses the synthesizer’s normalized opinion weights.
20-quarter synthesized forecastPrice targets, quarterly returns and the reasoning behind each step

Frozen forecast from 18 Sept 2026. Prices in USD; returns exclude dividends. Each quarter is compounded from the previous quarter.

Anchor: 39.13 USD1-year price return: -18.53%5-year price return: -11.40%

Swipe the table horizontally to read every column.

Twenty quarterly synthesized price forecasts in USD, with returns and rationale
QuarterTarget (USD)Quarter returnTotal returnForecast rationale
Q4 202635.64-8.91%-8.91%Post-merger integration expenses and initial foundry margin dilution confront persistent monetary tightening. Elevated Treasury yields near five percent spark multiple compression across speculative technology, driving equity de-rating despite resilient headline sovereign bookings.
Q1 202733.45-6.15%-14.51%Full-year reporting exposes consolidated gross margins compressing below thirty percent due to acquired foundry operations. Institutional investors re-anchor valuation models toward industrial hardware benchmarks, prompting multiple de-rating as annual operating cash burn nears five hundred million.
Q2 202732.78-2.02%-16.24%Unveiling commercial progress on the 256-qubit Superion platform and defense research milestones prompts a tactical relief rally. Speculative short covering temporarily offsets broader investor concerns regarding ongoing cleanroom capital intensity and macroeconomic discount rates.
Q3 202731.88-2.73%-18.53%Customer acceptance testing and qualification cycles for new hardware extend longer than anticipated, slowing cash conversion. Persistently high interest rates and ongoing share dilution dampen enthusiasm, pushing the stock into intermediate multiple consolidation.
Q4 202731.24-2.01%-20.16%Year-end federal defense appropriations and sovereign quantum networking awards deliver non-dilutive backlog expansion. High-margin government hardware delivery milestones provide vital top-line visibility, generating an operational price floor and lifting shares into calendar year-end.
Q1 202831.44+0.63%-19.66%Annual financial disclosures confirm consolidated revenue scaling past six hundred million dollars, driven by system shipments. However, persistent foundry maintenance expenses and research payrolls keep free cash flow negative, capping intermediate multiple expansion.
Q2 202831.30-0.44%-20.01%Successful bench testing of integrated photonic interconnects demonstrates modular multi-core scaling, reducing perceived technical execution risk. Expanded cloud compute utilization across hyperscaler platforms improves contribution margins, driving constructive institutional accumulation across the quarter.
Q3 202830.35-3.04%-22.45%Competing architectural announcements from superconducting and neutral-atom consortia generate narrative friction. Equity markets trim exposure as management signals elevated capital expenditures for fabrication facility modernizations, inducing moderate quarterly valuation pullbacks.
Q4 202831.15+2.66%-20.38%Commercial biopharma and materials optimization pilots convert into multi-year hybrid compute subscriptions. Narrowing quarterly operating cash deficits and robust sovereign cybersecurity renewals restore investor confidence, triggering a solid speculative rally into year-end.
Q1 202930.84-1.00%-21.18%Fiscal disclosures show total revenue approaching eight hundred million dollars, yet share count expansion moderates per-share economic gains. Investors reprice top-line growth against ongoing dilution, maintaining a sober valuation multiple aligned with specialized technology peers.
Q2 202931.65+2.62%-19.11%Demonstration of early fault-tolerant logical qubit error suppression on commercial workloads sparks renewed institutional engagement. Evidence that modular trapped-ion traps surpass classical heuristic limits on specialized tasks drives steady equity appreciation on high volume.
Q3 202931.00-2.06%-20.78%Broader macroeconomic cooling and cyclical semiconductor softness prompt routine multiple digestion across deep tech. Investors pause to evaluate enterprise pilot renewal rates while ongoing foundry depreciation expenses keep reported GAAP net income subdued.
Q4 202931.85+2.76%-18.59%High-margin cloud algorithmic compute revenue begins outpacing legacy contract manufacturing within the corporate sales mix. Improving blended gross margins validate the vertical integration thesis, driving solid share price appreciation as enterprise backlogs expand.
Q1 203031.82-0.12%-18.69%Full-year results confirm consolidated revenue crossing one billion dollars as operational cash burn visibly contracts. While capital intensity remains significant, improving unit economics across system deployments support steady institutional valuation multiples into early spring.
Q2 203033.09+4.00%-15.44%Volume delivery of interconnected modular quantum processing units to sovereign defense and national laboratories cements strategic infrastructure status. Expanding software licensing royalties improve earnings quality, generating constructive quarterly gains despite baseline competitive pressures.
Q3 203032.68-1.23%-16.48%Periodic silicon cleanroom maintenance cycles and broader technology sector profit-taking induce tactical consolidation. The market absorbs minor per-share dilution from employee equity vesting while awaiting formal third-quarter enterprise software deployment metrics.
Q4 203033.25+1.75%-15.02%Federal post-quantum cryptographic security deadlines generate an urgent surge in government and financial infrastructure upgrade orders. Accelerating hardware verification contracts and high-margin networking sales drive strong quarterly share performance into year-end.
Q1 203133.46+0.63%-14.48%Financial reports demonstrate full-year operating cash flow approaching positive breakeven, substantially eliminating existential financing concerns. Decreased reliance on secondary equity offerings bolsters investor sentiment, allowing fundamental institutional quality-growth accumulation to expand.
Q2 203134.45+2.95%-11.96%Widespread enterprise adoption of hybrid classical-quantum cloud architectures cements trapped-ion hardware as essential high-performance computing accelerators. Expanding commercial software margins fuel consistent quarterly price appreciation as market consensus endorses platform viability.
Q3 203134.67+0.64%-11.40%The five-year forecast horizon concludes with revenue surpassing two billion dollars and the business approaching self-sustaining profitability. Terminal valuation multiples fully compress to reflect a mature industrial technology leader, establishing sustainable market equilibrium.

The enterprise investment case presents a fundamental dichotomy between technological progress and per-share economic reality. Consolidation of domestic foundry infrastructure and proprietary trapped-ion control bolsters federal defense contracting and operational hardware iteration. However, headline top-line acceleration is heavily distorted by acquired low-margin contract fabrication and mark-to-market warrant swings that disguise persistent . In an elevated discount-rate environment with benchmark yields near five percent, the market's extreme price-to-sales multiple faces unavoidable decompression toward capital-intensive hardware comparables. Underlying technology progress survives, but and ongoing will severely limit per-share equity realization.

Key insights

  • Acquired merchant foundry revenue permanently lowers blended corporate , forcing institutional valuation frameworks to transition from pure software to industrial hardware multiples.
  • Massive derivative warrant liabilities and stock-based compensation steadily expand share count, ensuring that operational revenue expansion delivers disproportionately diluted equity gains per share.
  • Sovereign defense appropriations provide an essential non-dilutive revenue backstop, yet commercial enterprise software adoption remains insufficient to bridge annual operational cash deficits.

Deep Dive

Prevailing market consensus treats the company as an undisputed pure-play champion of quantum computing, extrapolating rapid headline revenue growth and sovereign defense awards into an unassailable commercial monopoly. The crowd heavily anchors on visionary algorithmic milestones and cash reserves, assuming that acquired semiconductor foundry assets validate while overlooking that reported top-line expansion relies on low-margin contract fabrication and non-cash accounting adjustments.

Protected research workspace

Paywalled preview begins: Deep Dive: detailed analysis

From this section to the end-of-preview notice below, research is provided as simplified HTML text and tables. Full access provides the complete interactive interface, charts and additional datasets.

AI Consensus
AI Opinions
Company Profile

Alpha Gap & Repricing Catalysts

Where does the current market narrative diverge from our AI Opinions—and what could close the gap?

Market Narrative

What does the market currently expect? Prevailing market consensus treats the company as an undisputed pure-play champion of quantum computing, extrapolating rapid headline revenue growth and sovereign defense awards into an unassailable commercial monopoly. The crowd heavily anchors on visionary algorithmic milestones and cash reserves, assuming that acquired semiconductor foundry assets validate while overlooking that reported top-line expansion relies on low-margin contract fabrication and non-cash accounting adjustments.

Alpha Gap

What is the biggest difference between market expectations and our AI forecasts? The crowd overestimates value by mistaking acquisitive top-line volume for high-margin software . Forensic evaluation reveals that over half of guided revenue stems from newly consolidated semiconductor foundry operations, which dilute from above fifty percent toward thirty percent. Furthermore, wild GAAP profit swings conceal a persistent annual operating near five hundred million dollars. In a restrictive , trading above fifty times sales creates extreme valuation vulnerability as investors inevitably reprice the business toward capital-intensive hardware multiples.

Repricing Catalyst

What could make the market recognize and close that gap? The decisive convergence catalyst will be audited financial reporting of the consolidated entity through late 2026 and early 2027. Disclosing blended below thirty percent alongside quarterly operating cash deficits exceeding one hundred million dollars will expose the heavy capital drag of foundry operations. This transparent margin reality will compel institutional analysts to deconstruct pure-play and re-rate equity valuation toward specialized industrial hardware benchmarks.

Sentiment and Timing

What do sentiment, volatility, and the market-recognition cycle suggest about the thesis timing?

Greed / Fear
Fear
Volatility
High Erratic
Cycle position
Overshoot

Sentiment divides between speculative retail enthusiasm surrounding hardware milestones and institutional caution regarding valuation duration. While volatile retail flows periodically bid up technical breakthroughs, institutional investors increasingly interpret the current cycle position as a valuation overshoot facing an inevitable fundamental de-rating.

Macro Regime Fit

Does the current market environment support the thesis? The macroeconomic backdrop is an aggressive headwind for this asset. With policy rates held near four percent and benchmark Treasury yields around five percent, elevated capital costs ruthlessly penalize long-duration equities with distant cash flows. Restrictive corporate budgets constrain speculative enterprise quantum pilots, while rising hurdle rates elevate the cost of funding capital-intensive semiconductor foundry infrastructure.

Advisor Disagreement

What do our AI Advisors disagree about most? The central disagreement centers on whether through semiconductor foundry ownership creates an unassailable operational moat or permanently impairs corporate profitability. Optimistic perspectives argue captive domestic fabrication eliminates packaging bottlenecks, accelerates modular trapped-ion scaling, and underwrites defense contracts. Conversely, skeptical perspectives emphasize that absorbing capital-heavy foundry operations dilutes corporate toward thirty percent and accelerates fixed operating . Furthermore, analysts dispute whether five percent benchmark interest rates will force rapid compression to low double-digit sales or allow premium platform multiples to persist until fault-tolerant advantage is verified.

Base-Case Forces

Event Risk ScoreVery High96/100

Near-certain positive forces

Top Drivers / Tailwinds

Near-certain forces that support the investment thesis. These forces are treated as part of the base case (more than 60% probability of occurrence). Impact columns are specific to this asset class.

Scroll to view all columns

Top Drivers / Tailwinds with asset-specific estimated impacts and thesis rationale
Driver / TailwindCategoryEst. stock-price impactEst. earnings impactWhy it matters
Trapped-ion gate fidelity leadershipInnovation And Product+32%+45%Natural atomic qubits deliver industry-leading gate fidelities exceeding 99.9% while advancing toward the 256-qubit Superion platform. High fidelity drastically reduces physical-to-logical qubit error-correction overhead compared to solid-state alternatives. This architectural precision secures multi-year enterprise cloud compute reservations and commercial co-development contracts, sustaining premium software-tier as algorithmic complexity scales.
Sovereign defense and security procurementPolitical And Geopolitical+25%+40%Geopolitical competition and federal mandates for post-quantum cryptographic migration accelerate non-dilutive defense contract awards. Captive partnerships across the Air Force Research Laboratory, DARPA, and sovereign intelligence agencies establish multi-year procurement baselines. This appropriated revenue insulates forward bookings from cyclical enterprise spending freezes and provides essential non-dilutive funding across developmental cycles.
Domestic foundry captureOperational Efficiency+20%+30%Acquiring domestic semiconductor foundry facilities secures captive cleanroom capacity and internalizes microfabricated ion-trap packaging. Eliminating third-party accelerates physical prototyping iterations for barium-trap processors. In addition to securing defense trusted-foundry certifications, commercial wafer fabrication adds hundreds of millions in baseline revenue, partially absorbing ongoing facility depreciation and development overhead.
Hybrid enterprise cloud compute integrationCompetitive Positioning+18%+24%Distribution agreements across Amazon Braket, Microsoft Azure, and Google Cloud embed quantum processing units natively into high-performance computing clusters. Enterprise clients utilize existing cloud budgets to pilot hybrid algorithms in combinatorial optimization and molecular simulation. This friction-free routing accelerates developer onboarding and drives recurring cloud access fees without requiring dedicated .

Near-certain negative forces

Top Frictions / Headwinds

Near-certain forces that could slow, cap, or damage the thesis. These forces are treated as part of the base case (more than 60% probability of occurrence). Impact columns are specific to this asset class.

Scroll to view all columns

Top Frictions / Headwinds with asset-specific estimated impacts and thesis rationale
Friction / HeadwindCategoryEst. stock-price impactEst. earnings impactWhy it matters
Extreme duration sensitivityMacroeconomic And Macrofinancial-42%-12%Trading at fifty-eight times trailing sales exposes equity value to severe multiple contraction as benchmark Treasury yields hover near five percent. Elevated discount rates penalize long-duration, non-earning growth assets. Institutional investors enforce strict multiple decompression toward normalized hardware benchmarks, heavily discounting distant terminal cash-flow projections despite steady headline revenue expansion.
Foundry penaltyOperational Efficiency-25%-35%Consolidating commercial semiconductor foundry operations fundamentally alters corporate economics, diluting historical from above fifty percent toward thirty percent. Managing physical cleanrooms, fab maintenance, and direct labor inflates fixed overhead. This structural business mix shift delays company-wide operating profitability and punctures the software-as-a-service valuation multiples previously awarded by growth investors.
Chronic operational and Capital Allocation-24%-30%Annual burn approaching five hundred million dollars rapidly consumes liquid balance-sheet reserves. Maintaining intensive hardware research alongside semiconductor manufacturing requires substantial . Management reliance on stock-based compensation and secondary share issuances steadily expands the share count, diluting fractional equity ownership and constraining long-term per-share earnings power.
Alternative quantum modality architectural competitionCompetitive Positioning-20%-22%Well-capitalized technology conglomerates and emerging startups are advancing rival superconducting, neutral-atom, and topological architectures. Competing modalities offer gate execution speeds orders of magnitude faster than trapped ions, alongside denser physical qubit configurations. If rival platforms achieve scalable error-corrected logical qubits first, commercial enterprise compute budgets will rapidly divert away from trapped-ion systems.

What Could Break or Accelerate the Thesis

Plausible downside scenarios

Tail Risks

Tail yet plausible downside scenarios selected for their highest potential impact.

Scroll to view all columns

Tail risks with plausibility, asset-specific potential impact and scenario rationale
Tail scenarioChance of OccurringStock Price ImpactWhy plausible / what changes
Trapped-ion modular optical scaling wall32%-60%Severe physical roadblocks in optical interconnect insertion loss, laser phase noise, or vibrational decoherence could halt the modular scaling roadmap beyond several hundred qubits. Failing to interconnect multiple processing traps would derail fault-tolerant timelines, prompting massive customer cancellations and multi-billion-dollar across acquired assets. The event carries under fifty percent probability because bench-scale prototypes currently demonstrate promise.
Distressed equity recapitalization liquidity shock28%-50%Persistently high operating combined with unexpectedly high foundry maintenance could deplete cash reserves by 2028 amid closed capital markets. Forcing deeply discounted secondary offerings or structured with punitive ratchet provisions would permanently impair common equity value per share. Existing multi-billion-dollar liquidity cushions keep this event below fifty percent probability.

Plausible upside scenarios

Tail Opportunities

Tail yet plausible upside scenarios selected for their highest potential impact.

Scroll to view all columns

Tail opportunities with plausibility, asset-specific potential impact and scenario rationale
Tail scenarioChance of OccurringStock Price ImpactWhy plausible / what changes
Early fault-tolerant algorithmic commercial breakthrough25%+75%A decisive technical breakthrough before 2028 demonstrating repeatable, fault-tolerant logical qubit operations on molecular simulation or combinatorial optimization could unlock immediate commercial utility. Enterprise clients would shift rapidly from subsidized research pilots to multi-million-dollar production compute reservations. This milestone remains below fifty percent probability due to formidable optical interconnect scaling and photon-loss bottlenecks.
Mandated sovereign quantum infrastructure procurement30%+55%Escalating geopolitical cyber tensions could prompt Western defense alliances by 2028 to enact emergency legislation mandating sole-source procurement of domestic quantum compute and communication backbones. As the sole integrated domestic trusted foundry provider, the company would capture multi-billion-dollar appropriated contracts, instantly eliminating . Congressional budget gridlock and inter-agency competition keep likelihood below fifty percent.

Company Financial Analysis

IONQ Earnings and Financials Analysis by AI

Financial figures available as of Sep 20, 2026. Only filings and source records available by this analysis date are included.

Earnings and financials

AI Review

Headline revenue shows explosive growth, surging to 246 million dollars over the trailing twelve months. However, this impressive top-line figure is heavily inflated by acquisitions rather than purely organic customer adoption. Meanwhile, reported net income swings wildly between huge paper profits and multi-billion-dollar accounting losses due to non-cash warrant revaluations. Beneath this accounting noise lies deep operational cash burn, with free cash flow remaining negative at 484 million dollars. While sovereign defense grants provide steady project funding, commercial enterprise sales are not yet large enough to offset massive engineering payrolls and administrative overhead.

Revenue, earnings, and cash flow

The table compares up to five fiscal years of revenue, net income, and free cash flow available to this analysis.

Revenue, net income, and free cash flow history
Fiscal yearRevenueNet incomeFree cash flow
2025USD 130MUSD -510.4MUSD -299.6M
2024USD 43.1MUSD -331.6MUSD -129.3M
2023USD 22MUSD -157.8MUSD -98.4M
2022USD 11.1MUSD -48.5MUSD -57.3M
2021USD 2.1MUSD -106.2MUSD -36.6M

Valuation context: historical P/E

The table compares up to five fiscal years of point-in-time valuation evidence available to this analysis.

Historical price-to-earnings ratios
Fiscal yearP/EEarnings basisCurrency basisTicker / reporting
2025--TTMLoss-makingUSD / USD
2024--TTMLoss-makingUSD / USD
2023--TTMLoss-makingUSD / USD
2022--AnnualLoss-makingUSD / USD
2021--AnnualLoss-makingUSD / USD

P/E uses historical market capitalization and earnings known at each period. Cross-currency observations are normalized to USD using point-in-time FX rates.

Profitability and margins

AI Review

Profit margins reveal a clear structural decline as the company expands its revenue mix. While early cloud software and research access delivered gross margins above sixty percent in 2023, increasing deliveries of customized hardware pushed gross margins down toward forty percent by 2025. Consolidating commercial contract manufacturing will drag gross margins lower still, settling closer to thirty percent. Because ongoing research and administrative spending vastly exceeds incoming revenue, overall operating margins remain deeply negative. Achieving profitable unit economics will require massive customer adoption of high-margin cloud software to overcome the fixed costs of physical manufacturing.

The table compares up to five fiscal years of operating income and reported profitability margins.

Operating income and margin history
Fiscal yearOperating incomeOperating marginNet margin
2025USD -633.7M-487.4%-392.6%
2024USD -232.5M-539.7%-770.0%
2023USD -157.8M-715.7%-715.8%
2022USD -85.7M-770.3%-435.8%
2021USD -38.7M-1843.1%-5058.9%

Balance sheet and leverage

AI Review

On the surface, the company maintains a formidable cash fortress with over two billion dollars in liquid cash and investments. Traditional funded debt is minimal, meaning there is virtually no immediate threat of debt default or bankruptcy in the near term. However, this financial cushion is built primarily on previous stock offerings rather than internally generated cash. Because the business consumes roughly five hundred million dollars annually, the cash pile provides approximately four years of operating runway. Without achieving commercial profitability, preserving this balance sheet will eventually require issuing more shares, diluting existing owners.

The table compares up to five fiscal years of debt, liquidity, net cash or debt, and current-ratio evidence.

Balance sheet leverage and liquidity history
Fiscal yearTotal debtCash + short-term investmentsNet cash / (debt)Current ratio
2025USD 30MUSD 2.4BUSD 1B net cash15.50x
2024USD 17.7MUSD 340.3MUSD 36.7M net cash10.50x
2023USD 8.1MUSD 355.4MUSD 27.6M net cash10.49x
2022USD 4.1MUSD 355.8MUSD 40.3M net cash18.43x
2021USD 4.2MUSD 522.5MUSD 394.8M net cash54.65x

Net debt below zero is displayed as net cash. Current ratio is current assets divided by current liabilities.

Capex and investment intensity

AI Review

The business has fundamentally changed from an asset-light research laboratory into a heavy industrial manufacturer. Rather than outsourcing chip production, management spent billions acquiring semiconductor foundry facilities and optical technology specialists to gain direct physical control over hardware fabrication. This aggressive shift insources vital microchip cleanrooms and speeds up development testing. However, owning physical factories introduces heavy ongoing equipment maintenance and building depreciation costs. The long-term payoff depends entirely on whether commercial quantum computing reaches mass adoption before factory upkeep drains financial reserves.

The table compares up to five fiscal years of capital expenditure and research-and-development investment.

Capital expenditure and research and development history
Fiscal yearCapital expenditureR&D spend
2025USD 16.4MUSD 305.7M
2024USD 23.6MUSD 136.8M
2023USD 19.5MUSD 92.3M
2022USD 12.6MUSD 44M
2021USD 10MUSD 20.2M

Quarterly Forecast Scenarios

IONQ Averaged Consensus Scenarios

One row per forecast quarter. Asset scenario targets are shown in USD; benchmark values are shown in USD.

Scroll to view all columns

Quarterly Bear Case Stock Price, Base Case Stock Price, Bull Case Stock Price, and S&P 500 benchmark forecasts for IONQ.
QuarterBear case (USD)Base case (USD)Bull case (USD)S&P 500 benchmark (USD)
$34.43$35.69$37.17$750.26
$28.24$33.20$39.60$736.44
$24.00$32.76$41.75$743.40
$21.60$31.89$43.84$755.15
$18.58$31.07$42.53$776.22
$16.35$31.63$45.08$787.13
$15.04$31.54$49.13$802.83
$15.79$31.04$52.57$812.05
$14.05$31.84$54.68$839.18
$12.09$32.02$59.05$850.50
$11.12$33.01$63.18$872.39
$10.45$32.68$61.92$885.51
$9.512$33.89$68.11$909.56
$8.751$34.59$74.24$916.13
$9.1011$35.94$78.70$936.51
$8.464$36.01$81.85$947.34
$7.7869$36.62$79.39$969.59
$7.3197$37.36$84.95$979.99
$7.1001$38.67$89.19$999.60
$6.9581$39.21$91.87$1,012

Behind the synthesis

How each opinion shapes the consensus

14 opinions · 100% allocated

The independently verified consensus across submitted reports establishes that top-line revenue expansion is heavily driven by inorganic consolidation and sovereign defense contracts rather than recurring commercial software adoption. Multiple reports duplicate the assumption that acquiring semiconductor fabrication infrastructure guarantees strategic vertical dominance, yet forensic analysis confirms it mechanically dilutes blended gross margins toward thirty percent while increasing capital intensity. The strongest contrarian argument notes that trapped-ion gate fidelity exceeding 99.9% provides genuine technological leadership, but this physics milestone cannot override five percent benchmark interest rates that compress an extreme sales multiple. Furthermore, volatile GAAP net income swings reflect non-cash warrant revaluations rather than self-sustaining operational earnings. Consequently, weighting prioritizes reports with rigorously verified balance-sheet accounting, explicit share count dilution bridges, and sober multi-segment valuation models, while downweighting speculative narratives that extrapolate pure-play software multiples onto commoditized semiconductor manufacturing revenue.

AI RESEARCHER
Universal Investor AI advisor icon

Universal Investor AI

The Polymath

Opus 5
Weight14.0/100

Awarded highest weighting due to meticulous primary-source documentation from SEC filings, reconciling warrant liability distortions, intercompany eliminations, and the 50% increase in share count. Its rigorous mathematical demonstration of per-share dilution versus top-line expansion provides exceptional analytical quality.

AI RESEARCHER
Universal Investor AI advisor icon

Universal Investor AI

The Polymath

GPT-6 Astra
Weight14.0/100

Receives top weight for superior empirical grounding in SEC Form 10-Q disclosures, decomposing organic quantum revenue from acquired merchant foundry sales. Its explicit sum-of-the-parts valuation model and post-deal share count reconciliation provide unmatched institutional precision.

AI RESEARCHER
Universal Investor AI advisor icon

Universal Investor AI

The Polymath

Gemini 3.8 Flash
Weight9.0/100

Demonstrates strong forensic rigor regarding SkyWater foundry gross margin compression down to 32% and balance-sheet warrant distortions. The causal link between 5% Treasury yields and prolonged enterprise sales multiple de-rating is logically coherent and thoroughly evidenced.

AI RESEARCHER
Sherlock Holmes AI advisor icon

Sherlock Holmes AI

The Whistleblower

Gemini 3.8 Flash
Weight8.0/100

This analysis provides a balanced assessment of technological trapped-ion fidelity against the operational margin dilution caused by semiconductor foundry consolidation. It accurately captures the valuation multiple compression driven by elevated interest rates while acknowledging sovereign revenue cushions.

AI RESEARCHER
Machiavelli AI advisor icon

Niccolo Machiavelli AI

The Insider

Gemini 3.8 Flash
Weight8.0/100

Excels in evaluating the political economy of sovereign defense procurement and DMEA Trusted Foundry accreditation. Its assessment of the political moat balancing valuation compression under tight monetary policy provides an essential, well-supported contrarian insight.

AI THINKER
Universal Investor AI advisor icon

Universal Investor AI

The Polymath

Gemini 3.8 Flash
Weight7.0/100

Provides clear causal reasoning regarding the divergence between revenue expansion and per-share economic dilution. It correctly identifies the thermodynamic capital drain of quantum hardware scaling and the drag of elevated discount rates on speculative growth assets.

AI RESEARCHER
Elon Musk AI advisor icon

Elon Musk AI

The Visionary

Gemini 3.8 Flash
Weight6.0/100

Effectively identifies physical trapped-ion gate latency limits and share count inflation exceeding 70%. While its industrial engineering perspective correctly identifies foundry margin drag, its intermediate price path exhibits minor excess volatility, warranting a moderate weight.

AI RESEARCHER
Ray Dalio AI advisor icon

Ray Dalio AI

The Strategist

Gemini 3.8 Flash
Weight6.0/100

Skillfully frames the collision between secular technological productivity and late-cycle monetary tightening. While its macro transmission mechanics are sound, its projection of operating margin recovery is slightly optimistic given heavy ongoing foundry depreciation burdens.

AI THINKER
Warren Buffett AI advisor icon

Warren Buffett AI

The Value Seeker

Gemini 3.8 Flash
Weight5.0/100

Offers a disciplined value-oriented critique highlighting persistent negative free cash flow exceeding 480 million dollars and extreme multiple vulnerability. However, it somewhat understates the non-dilutive cushion provided by expanding sovereign defense appropriations, justifying a modest relative weight.

AI RESEARCHER
Warren Buffett AI advisor icon

Warren Buffett AI

The Value Seeker

Gemini 3.8 Flash
Weight5.0/100

Presents sound economic reasoning regarding the serial rollup playbook funded with dilutive equity paper. However, it projects an overly pessimistic terminal price that downplays the strategic defense value of accredited domestic trusted foundry facilities.

AI RESEARCHER
Michael Burry AI advisor icon

Michael Burry AI

The Vulture

Gemini 3.8 Flash
Weight5.0/100

Delivers a trenchant forensic dissection of the equity-funded acquisition spree and massive goodwill inflation. While its warning regarding future asset impairments is credible, its projected liquidation multiple overlooks enduring sovereign strategic support.

AI RESEARCHER
J.P. Morgan AI advisor icon

J.P. Morgan AI

The Titan

Gemini 3.8 Flash
Weight5.0/100

Constructs a detailed institutional analysis of vertical integration and optical interconnect networking. However, its projected enterprise valuation expansion understates the severe valuation drag imposed by benchmark Treasury yields near 5% on unprofitable tech.

AI RESEARCHER
Superintelligence AI advisor icon

Superintelligence AI

The Anthropologist

Gemini 3.8 Flash
Weight4.0/100

Presents an articulate anthropological perspective on quantum industrialization, but relies on aggressive commercialization assumptions and margin re-expansion that contradict observed foundry dilution. Its hyper-bullish multiple trajectory receives low weight due to speculative cash-flow timing.

AI THINKER
Superintelligence AI advisor icon

Superintelligence AI

The Anthropologist

Gemini 3.8 Flash
Weight4.0/100

Highlights valid thermodynamic constraints regarding trapped-ion gate speeds versus competing solid-state architectures. However, its aggressive valuation collapse thesis underestimates the defensive floor established by multi-year sovereign intelligence and defense contracting backlogs.

Skip to references

Research Provenance

References & Context

This IONQ consensus analysis combines structured market evidence with independent AI-agent forecasts. External references below are limited to sources recorded by the researcher agents for this forecast batch.

Primary analysis inputs

  • iPulse AI Multi-Agent Forecasts — independent analyst personas, model outputs, and consensus synthesis.
  • iPulse AI Global Events Context — macroeconomic, geopolitical, regulatory, and industry-event context.
  • Structured market history — prices, distributions, volatility, identifiers, and listing metadata.
  • Company earnings and financial statements — revenue, profitability, balance-sheet, cash-flow, and investment trends.
  • Researcher web evidence — public sources consulted to challenge and contextualize the forecast thesis.

Independent AI Advisor panel

AI Advisors
14
AI Researchers
11
AI Thinkers
3

Context retained with this Consensus

The same public-safe market, global-event, and fundamental context supplied to the AI Advisor panel.

03

Global context snapshot

2025 Full-Year Global Market and World-Events Context

Download Archived Snapshot

Coverage 2025-01-01 to 2025-12-31 · Knowledge cutoff 2025-12-31

This full-year context package covers the principal geopolitical, economic, monetary-policy, technology, trade, energy, and institutional developments that shaped global markets during 2025. It gives the forecasting model a chronological account of major world events together with their likely transmission into growth, inflation, interest rates, supply chains, commodities, currencies, public markets, and sector-level investment conditions.

The package also includes monthly and quarterly macroeconomic and cross-asset reference tables spanning US and international growth, central-bank policy, sovereign yields, major equity indices, foreign exchange, energy, industrial and precious metals, and digital assets. Quarterly and full-year high-impact summaries are integrated; monthly quantitative series remain working values pending final audit, and that qualification is part of the preserved context.

Top 3 market shifts from 2025 Full-Year Global Market and World-Events Context
Top 3 Market Shifts From FileDateStatus
DeepSeek shock and AI economics reset2025-01-27OPEN ENDED TREND
US tariff regime escalation and trade-system rupture2025-02-01ACTIVE POLICY REGIME
Federal Reserve easing cycle after a prolonged hold2025-09-17ACTIVE POLICY REGIME

2026 Year-to-Date Global Market and World-Events Context Through September 20

Download Archived Snapshot

Coverage 2026-01-01 to 2026-09-20 · Knowledge cutoff 2026-09-20

January 1-September 20, 2026: monetary tightening, energy security, trade restrictions, AI financing and divergent growth; five leading market themes.

Fed raised rates to 3.75%-4.00%; ECB hike is in force and BOJ increase starts September 24. Markets through September 18, bitcoin through September 19.

Top 3 market shifts from 2026 Year-to-Date Global Market and World-Events Context Through September 20
Top 3 Market Shifts From FileDateStatus
Renewed monetary tightening amid persistent inflation2026-01-30ACTIVE POLICY REGIME
Iran/Hormuz conflict and wider energy-security disruption2026-02-28ONGOING
Tariff legal reset and strategic supply restrictions2026-02-20ACTIVE POLICY REGIME

Representative Sources of the Context File

And more sources from the retained context package.

02

Fundamental context

Income statement

9 fields

depreciationAndAmortization · ebit · ebitda · grossProfit · +5 more fields

Balance sheet

11 fields

cash · commonStockSharesOutstanding · netDebt · netReceivables · +7 more fields

Cash flow

5 fields

capitalExpenditures · dividendsPaid · freeCashFlow · salePurchaseOfStock · +1 more field

annual: 2019-12-31–2025-12-31, 7 periods; quarterly: 2023-09-30–2026-06-30, 12 periods

Currencies cited: USD (quote USD; primary reporting USD; converted/valuation USD).

End of the paywalled preview

The excerpt from Deep Dive: detailed analysis to this notice is the simplified paywalled content included on this page. A signed-in, verified account with the required subscription provides the full interactive interface and the additional research, datasets and tools listed below.

Those additional materials are not included in this preview and cannot be revealed by removing its visual restrictions.

Additional with full access

  • Individual AI Advisor reports

    • Investment theses
    • Bull and bear scenarios and alpha signals
    • Drivers, headwinds, risks and opportunities
    • Quarterly forecast rationale
    • Advisor research references and configuration
  • Additional datasets and interactive tools

    • Interactive forecast comparisons
    • Available detailed financial statements
    • Market history and corporate-action adjustments
    • Eligible historical publication workspaces

Explore complete public research examples

These public assets show the complete AI Consensus research. Their findings concern those assets, not this report.