1. Freeze the ranked candidates
The workflow records the exact source batch, ranking snapshot, formula identifiers, calculation date, and candidate rows used for the edition.
Top Picks methodology
Live Rankings order assets using quantitative forecast metrics. Editorial Picks add a separate evidence review and human approval. Learn how the ranking columns, dated editions, and source forecast batches relate.
Updated Updated by Russlan Ramdowar
Overview
The Live Rankings table ranks assets by the selected asset class, action, horizon, and return treatment. It is designed to show the most important decision fields in one row: consensus score, rating, expected return, dividend contribution, valuation, risk pressure, financial quality, volatility, and forecast price context.
The table is intentionally column-driven. Some columns are universal across asset classes, while others only appear when the underlying asset has suitable data. For example, Financial Health is equity-only, and P/E ratio is meaningful only when earnings fundamentals are available.
Research funnel
iPulse AI Engine V7 is the public name for the governed Top Picks pipeline. It covers asset preselection, independent AI-advisor forecasts, the asset-level consensus, risk and fundamental diagnostics, cross-asset scoring, ranking, and the final current-event editorial review. It is an end-to-end research system name, not the name of one language model.
The essential distinction
Screened does not mean deeply analyzed. The approximately 100,000 instruments at the top are a searchable candidate universe. Only the much smaller batch cohort shown below receives the governed multi-agent Deep Analysis workflow.
Stage 1 · Candidate discovery
iPulse AI scans catalog and market metadata to find eligible candidates. This is the top of the funnel—not a count of assets that received AI-advisor forecasts or full Deep Analysis.
~100,000
screening candidates only
~99,000
Stocks
~200
ETFs and ETPs
~50
Crypto assets
~100
Indices
~150
Commodities and macro markets
Stage 2 · Actual Deep Analysis
These selected assets—not the 100,000-instrument screening universe—were processed through the governed AI-advisor workflow, producing 5,964 individual advisor forecasts.
Analyzed cohort grew batch by batch
Batch 1
204
assets
Batch 2
212
assets
Batch 3
247
assets
Batch 4
312
assets
Batch 5
312
assets
Batch 6
377
assets
Batch 7
426
assets
Stage 3 · Eligible ranking cohort
Only deeply analyzed assets that match the selected asset class, action, horizon, and data-eligibility rules enter that ranking. Each public edition reports its actual assessed, eligible, and excluded counts; no fixed number is borrowed from the screening universe.
Stage 4 · Live Rankings
Every eligible asset in a Live Rankings table is scored with the same versioned iPulse AI Consensus Score formula. The table then sorts those comparable scores for its selected asset class, action, and forecast horizon—without asset-specific formula overrides.
The exact count is disclosed on each table and can change as eligibility and data coverage change.
Stage 5 · Published Editorial Top Picks
A page can show fewer when fewer assets pass its quantitative and editorial requirements.
Ranking
The default ranking uses the canonical dividend-inclusive iPulse AI Consensus Score when dividend treatment is enabled. If a view is switched to price-only where diagnostic fields exist, the table can show ex-dividend score and signal values for comparison.
Ranking basis
Top Buy views prioritize stronger positive iPulse AI Scores and bullish ratings. Top Sell / Short views prioritize weaker or negative iPulse AI Scores and bearish ratings. The score itself is explained in the Consensus Score methodology.
Editorial workflow
A live ranking is a quantitative output, not an editorial endorsement. After the ranking layer updates, the Editorial Review Workflow creates a frozen candidate snapshot and tests the selected assets against evidence published after the underlying Deep Analysis run. This keeps current-event review separate from both model generation and formula-based scoring.
The workflow records the exact source batch, ranking snapshot, formula identifiers, calculation date, and candidate rows used for the edition.
Recent company filings, official announcements, news, market events, and relevant source updates are checked against each stored thesis.
Each candidate receives a current-evidence status. Material thesis changes, limitations, sources, and any re-analysis requirement remain in the governed review record.
A named Editorial Approver reviews the evidence package and approves or rejects the public edition. Approval does not rewrite the underlying AI forecast or ranking.
The public page identifies its evidence cutoff, Deep Analysis batch, calculation date, editorial update date, sources, limitations, and accountable approver.
Repeated review outcomes become Lessons Learned and can change later methodology or trigger a new Deep Analysis run; they never alter the historic source artifact.
Editorial review entered the public operating system with V6 and remains active in V7. It was introduced after the raw Batch 6 Deep Analysis execution. It therefore governs publication and current-evidence validation; it did not influence the original Batch 6 model outputs.
Column dictionary
The ranked security or market asset, including name, ticker, category, logo, and listing context where available.
A -1000 to +1000 risk-adjusted consensus score. Positive values lean bullish, negative values lean bearish, and values near zero are weaker or more balanced.
The directional rating band derived from the iPulse AI Score and economic guardrails, such as STRONG BUY, BUY, NEUTRAL, PARTIALLY SELL, or SELL ALL.
The total compounded return over the full selected horizon, including reinvested annual net dividends when usable dividend history exists.
The dividend-inclusive return converted to a one-year equivalent rate, useful for comparing 1Y and 5Y horizons.
The annual net dividend contribution used by the ranking pipeline. It is estimated from historical cash-dividend events and prior close prices.
Trailing valuation multiple for equities, computed upstream as market cap divided by trailing four-quarter net income, with currency normalization where needed.
A five-band display of the underlying 0-100 event-risk pressure score from clustered consensus frictions and tail risks. Cells retain the number for precision, such as High (75).
A 0-100 equity-only quality score based on liquidity, leverage safety, profitability, cash generation, and operating trend.
The historical annualized volatility used as a risk context input. It is separate from Event Risks.
The projected horizon price compared with the latest close price used by the ranking snapshot.
Shown in comparison views to identify which market close date was used for a row or recomputed snapshot.
Dividend treatment
Net Dividend Contrib. describes the dividend income component used in dividend-inclusive total return. It is not a marketing yield estimate; it is the pipeline input used to adjust expected return for dividend-paying assets.
Dividend uplift formula
dividend_adjusted_return =
((1 + price_return) * (1 + annual_net_dividend_contribution)^years) - 1
annualized_return =
(1 + dividend_adjusted_return)^(1 / years) - 1Assets without usable dividend history receive no dividend uplift. For some views, price-only diagnostics may still exist, but the canonical Top Picks ranking uses the dividend-inclusive basis when dividend treatment is enabled.
Event Risks
The Event Risks column is the user-facing label for the underlying 0-100 event-risk pressure score. The score is based on the SEO/GEO summary layer after repeated advisor concerns have been consolidated into consensus friction factors and consensus tail risks. It does not include historical volatility, Financial Health, or advisor disagreement, because those are separate diagnostics.
Very Low
0-19
Low
20-39
Moderate
40-59
High
60-79
Very High
80-100
Event Risk score formula
friction_pressure =
sum(abs(friction_impact_pct) * rank_weight)
where rank weights are 1.00, 0.75, 0.55, 0.40
tail_risk_pressure =
sum(abs(downside_impact_pct) * probability_pct / 100 * rank_weight)
where rank weights are 1.00, 0.65
raw_event_pressure =
0.60 * friction_pressure + 0.40 * tail_risk_pressure
risk_score =
percentile(raw_event_pressure), 0 to 100, higher means riskierThe Asset Snowflake uses the display-friendly inverse, Risk Resilience = 100 - the underlying Event Risk score.
Financial Health
Financial Health is shown only when enough equity fundamentals are available. It is not used as a universal score for crypto, commodities, FX, or indices because those assets do not share the same balance sheet and income statement structure.
Financial Health formula
financial_health_score =
0.20 * liquidity
+ 0.25 * leverage_safety
+ 0.25 * profitability
+ 0.20 * cash_generation
+ 0.10 * operating_trend20 percent
Current ratio and cash-to-current-liabilities percentiles. Higher liquidity scores better.
25 percent
Net-debt-to-EBITDA and liabilities-to-equity percentiles, inverted so lower leverage stress scores better.
25 percent
Operating margin and return on equity percentiles.
20 percent
Free-cash-flow margin and operating-cash-flow-to-net-income percentiles.
10 percent
Three-year revenue CAGR and three-year operating margin change percentiles.
The score can be AVAILABLE, PARTIAL, INSUFFICIENT_DATA, or NOT_APPLICABLE depending on how much usable fundamental data exists for the asset.
Display rules
Top Picks avoids showing blank or misleading columns where possible. Event Risks appear when event-risk pressure is available. Financial Health appears when equity fundamentals are sufficient. P/E appears when earnings data supports a meaningful multiple. Voice-count columns appear in detailed table modes.
The main table focuses on dividend-inclusive expected return and annualized return. Price-only return remains part of forecast price diagnostics, but it is not the primary column for Top Picks ranking.