Brent Crude Spot in US Dollar (XBRUSD.FOREX) AI OPINIONS & ADVISOR ANALYSIS
Read the selected AI Advisor’s complete report, scenarios and forecast. Select Consensus for its investment thesis and a preview of advisor weights. Eligible access unlocks all 14 advisor reports and comparisons.
Updated on 5 October 2026Deep analysis 21 September 2026
Russlan Ramdowar
GPT-6 AstraUniversal Investor AI
The Polymath FrameworkPrice-adjusted rating
Partial Sell
5-Year Return Est.
-22.2%
XBRUSD.FOREX does not currently pay dividends
Historical prices and published forecast
- Observed price
- Published advisor forecast
Quarterly Events ForecastPrice targets, total returns and complete scenario reasoning
Forecast prices in USD. Returns are cumulative from the forecast anchor. Swipe horizontally to read every column.
| Quarter | Forecast | Total return | Scenario |
|---|---|---|---|
| $107 | +6.0% | Winter procurement meets impaired Gulf delivery in this projection, keeping refiners focused on immediately available Atlantic barrels. Inventory depletion outweighs tighter financing, so the spot quote rises despite demand destruction and substantial uncertainty around repair schedules. | |
| $95.9 | -4.6% | Partial restoration of export routes begins to reduce precautionary bidding during the first quarter of 2027. Stocks remain depleted, but the direction of cargo availability improves faster than refinery demand, reversing part of the winter premium. | |
| $84.4 | -16.0% | Repair work and shipping adaptations deliver more usable Gulf supply in this scenario, while spring refinery maintenance limits crude intake. Buyers gain alternatives to premium Atlantic cargoes, allowing a sharper decline even before inventories fully recover. | |
| $79.3 | -21.1% | Summer fuel consumption cushions the market, but cumulative export recovery and new Atlantic barrels outweigh that support. Initial inventory builds challenge the shortage narrative, moving XBRUSD toward a less disrupted clearing price rather than a crisis valuation. | |
| $77.0 | -23.5% | By late 2027, producers confront weaker realized prices and begin restraining discretionary supply growth. Restocking absorbs some returning barrels, yet recovering inventories continue to reduce convenience yield, leaving the spot benchmark modestly lower through this period. | |
| $73.9 | -26.5% | Refinery maintenance and expanding non-Gulf supply create a temporary surplus early in 2028. Consumer recovery proves insufficient to absorb every additional cargo, while higher stock coverage reduces refiners' willingness to pay for immediate delivery. | |
| $73.1 | -27.2% | Renewed producer restraint slows inventory accumulation as the market approaches a more balanced operating range. Commissioned offshore capacity still competes for refinery slots, leaving a slight downward bias rather than extending the previous year's steep correction. | |
| $75.3 | -25.1% | Summer transport demand and disciplined export scheduling temporarily tighten prompt availability. Refinery runs increase faster than incremental supply during this projected quarter, drawing working inventories and supporting a modest rebound without reviving the original disruption premium. | |
| $73.1 | -27.3% | Autumn maintenance reduces crude intake while newly available capacity remains in service. Seasonal stock rebuilding exposes the market's remaining slack, and refiners resist higher differentials, reversing the summer gain despite emerging evidence of slower upstream investment. | |
| $70.9 | -29.5% | Early 2029 brings another inventory-building window as vehicle substitution restrains gasoline growth and offshore additions continue reaching market. Producer adjustments lag the softer call on crude, pushing the benchmark toward the trough of the projected cycle. | |
| $71.6 | -28.8% | Lower realized prices begin curbing discretionary drilling and slowing approvals for marginal developments. Existing projects still deliver barrels, but anticipated supply growth moderates enough to stabilize prompt balances, allowing a small recovery rather than another liquidation. | |
| $73.7 | -26.7% | Summer refinery demand rises against more cautious producer supply plans. Inventories stop increasing materially in this projection, so the market assigns greater value to available barrels and prices recover, although substitution prevents a sustained shortage narrative. | |
| $72.3 | -28.1% | Late-2029 maintenance temporarily restores a modest surplus, while petrochemical growth increasingly favors gas-derived feedstocks over naphtha. This limits the call on refinery crude and trims spot prices, despite lower upstream spending beginning to constrain future additions. | |
| $72.3 | -28.1% | By early 2030, replacement requirements and demand substitution broadly offset each other. Producers adjust discretionary output to prevent persistent stock builds, leaving the benchmark approximately unchanged as the market transitions from post-disruption normalization toward a managed balance. | |
| $73.7 | -26.7% | Earlier investment restraint now begins reducing the volume of incremental crude reaching refineries. With inventories nearer desired operating coverage, modest demand gains require firmer prices to mobilize marginal supply rather than drawing indefinitely on surplus barrels. | |
| $75.9 | -24.5% | Summer consumption tightens the projected balance because mature-field decline offsets more new production than during the earlier expansion phase. Refiners bid modestly higher for prompt supply, while available spare capacity limits the scale of the advance. | |
| $74.4 | -26.0% | Seasonal refinery maintenance rebuilds working stocks and temporarily weakens prompt differentials. Producers avoid a broad output surge, but softer crude intake is sufficient to reverse part of the summer rally without breaking the emerging price stabilization. | |
| $75.1 | -25.3% | Early-2031 supply planning reflects the need to finance replacement barrels after several years of restrained prices. Inventory coverage remains adequate, yet limited incremental capacity gives producers slightly more negotiating leverage, supporting a small upward move rather than scarcity pricing. | |
| $76.7 | -23.8% | Refinery utilization improves into the warmer season while upstream additions mainly replace depletion. The projected balance tightens marginally, requiring a modest price increase to ration discretionary consumption and encourage production adjustments, not a renewed geopolitical shock. | |
| $78.2 | -22.2% | By September 2031, slower supply expansion offsets much of the drag from vehicle and feedstock substitution. Inventories settle near desired coverage, and the benchmark reaches roughly $79, below the anchor but above the projected cycle trough. |
1. Investment Thesis — Base Case
Brent's scarcity rent outlives the headlines but not necessarily the repair cycle. XBRUSD is the supplied USD/barrel spot series, anchored at $101, not the context's $103.87 futures quote. I project delayed normalization during 2027, temporary inventory rebuilding, then supply discipline stabilizing prices around $79 by September 2031: a compounded 22% decline. This is price exposure, excluding storage, financing and derivative carry. Factor impacts are nonadditive judgmental counterfactual estimates for prices and global crude/product inventories, including strategic stocks. Given poor expected appreciation and substantial squeeze risk, reduce exposure rather than pursue an unhedged short. Cash offers the cleaner competing allocation.
- IEA reports 507 million barrels drawn February–August; rebuilding that buffer prevents an immediate return to abundance. (iea.org)
- A modeled 0.7 mb/d surplus adds roughly 256 million barrels annually, progressively compressing prompt scarcity premia.
- The $79 terminal estimate sits within supplied 2023–24 trading ranges; depletion argues against extrapolating a permanent glut.
2. Scenarios & Signals
2.1. Bull Case
Repairs fail, then the replacement pipeline thins. Lasting Gulf capacity losses and delayed upstream projects keep accessible supply below recovering demand, while defensive stock purchases magnify the shortage. The stronger OPEC demand-growth interpretation gains credibility, and spare capacity proves less deliverable than headline figures imply. (opec.org) Under this combined scenario, XBRUSD could finish 2031 around $110–130, roughly 40%–66% above the base endpoint; that convexity argues for retaining a limited geopolitical hedge rather than liquidating indiscriminately.
2.2. Bear Case
Returning barrels meet disappearing buyers. A synchronized downturn combines with a quota rupture to overwhelm restocking demand, compress refinery margins and push producers into a market-share contest; substantial curtailments eventually arrest the inventory build. Faster vehicle substitution would deepen that adjustment. In this scenario, XBRUSD could finish 2031 around $45–60, approximately 24%–43% below the base endpoint, making passive long exposure inferior to cash despite intermittent short-covering rallies.
2.3. Behavioral Alpha Signals
Sentiment, repricing cycle, crowd narrative, catalyst, and macro alignment.Expected Volatility Regime
Greed and Fear Index
Cycle Position
Price action and thesis reinforcement are feeding each other.
What does Media Tell? (Crowd Consensus)
The front end buys insurance, not a perpetual shortage. IEA-reported backwardation supports a physical-scarcity narrative, while EIA's September outlook projects $74 annual-average Brent for 2027. This indicates a split narrative rather than unanimous structural bullishness. The anchoring bias is extrapolating disrupted delivery into durable value; positioning data are unavailable, so speculative crowding cannot be established. (iea.org)
What Crowds Get Wrong? (Alpha/Value Gap)
The crowd modestly overestimates Brent's durable value, but normalization is not an undiscovered trade. EIA's $74 forecast was frozen on September 3, before the supplied September 11 pipeline shutdown; using it as today's fair value would underprice immediate scarcity. (eia.gov) The deeper asymmetry is that restored capacity can outpace recovering consumption, while substitution outlasts the crisis. Without this instrument's forward curve or executable financing terms, the evidence supports reducing long exposure, not claiming a riskless short or measured spot arbitrage. (iea.org)
When will Value Gap Repricing Happen? (Repricing Catalyst)
Sustained export recovery, followed by seasonally adjusted inventory builds, is the recognition catalyst—not another ceasefire headline. In the base case this emerges during 2027–28; the first evidence would be higher Gulf loadings and weaker prompt differentials. Repricing remains conditional on repairs restoring accessible supply rather than merely announced capacity.
How is Asset Influenced by Macro Regime?
The September 16 Fed hike to 3.75%–4.00% raises inventory-financing costs and threatens marginal fuel demand; a firmer dollar would amplify that pressure. (federalreserve.gov) AI's power buildout primarily favors electricity and gas, not Brent. (iea.org) I treat AI and robotics as incremental efficiency tools, not a material net oil-demand catalyst. Easing would weaken this headwind.
3. Positive & Negative Factors, Risks & Opportunities
3.1. Base-Case Forces
Near-certain positive forces
Top Drivers / Tailwinds
Structural or operating forces that support this advisor thesis. These forces are treated as part of the base case (more than 60% probability of occurrence).
Scroll to view all columns
| Driver / Tailwind | Category | Est. commodity-price impact | Est. inventory impact | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Depletion Taxes Every NEW Barrel | Supply Dynamics | +10% | -5.0% | Natural decline keeps Brent's replacement requirement large even when demand stagnates. The IEA's September 2025 decline study estimates 5.6% annual observed decline in post-peak conventional oilfields, not in total global supply. I assign 95% likelihood to persistent replacement pressure: project delays and restrained reinvestment remove deliverable crude, limit inventory accumulation, and lift the clearing price relative to a no-depletion counterfactual. (iea.org) |
| Demand Survives Beyond THE Commute | Demand Dynamics | +9.0% | -3.0% | Emerging-market freight, aviation and industrial consumption prevent road-fuel substitution from becoming an immediate collapse in refinery crude demand. IEA's Oil 2025 projected India's consumption rising about 1 mb/d through 2030; OPEC's June 2026 outlook retains a stronger demand-growth interpretation. I assign 85% likelihood to expanding non-OECD consumption, which absorbs available barrels and offsets part, not all, of electrification's inventory-building effect. (iea.org) |
| Cartel Defense Slows THE Descent | Producer And Cartel | +8.0% | -4.0% | Saudi-led supply management should restrain Brent's downside once export routes normalize and prices weaken. The seven participating OPEC+ countries froze October 2026 targets at September levels, demonstrating continued coordination despite physical disruption. I assign 75% likelihood to renewed restraint during the horizon; actual withheld exports, rather than quota announcements, would reduce stock builds, although revenue pressures and nonmember competition limit the protection. (opec.org) |
| Empty Tanks Become Future Buyers | Storage And Logistics | +5.0% | +5.0% | Depleted buffers create an additional buyer when disrupted barrels finally return. EIA's September 2026 outlook estimated global stocks had already fallen 400 million barrels, making partial replenishment a plausible multiyear demand source rather than immediate surplus disposal. I assign 80% likelihood to rebuilding commercial or strategic holdings; procurement supports Brent even while measured inventories rise, with the effect fading as desired coverage is restored. (eia.gov) |
Near-certain negative forces
Top Frictions / Headwinds
Expected frictions that can slow, cap, or damage this advisor thesis. These forces are treated as part of the base case (more than 60% probability of occurrence).
Scroll to view all columns
| Friction / Headwind | Category | Est. commodity-price impact | Est. inventory impact | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Restored Exports Unwind Scarcity RENT | Supply Dynamics | -26% | +8.0% | Restoring existing output is faster than developing a new petroleum province. The IEA's September report projects an 8 mb/d supply rebound in 2027 against 2.6 mb/d demand recovery, conditional on Gulf normalization. I assign 80% likelihood to substantial restoration by 2031, not a dated ceasefire: returning cargoes rebuild inventories and erode Brent's delivery premium, even if repairs delay the initial decline. (iea.org) |
| Atlantic Projects Dilute GULF Leverage | Supply Dynamics | -13% | +4.0% | Sanctioned offshore developments add crude that does not require Hormuz transit. ExxonMobil's November 2025 Guyana update targeted approximately 250,000 b/d each from Uaru and Whiptail, scheduled for 2026 and 2027; commissioning remains an execution assumption, not verified delivery. I assign 90% likelihood to material Atlantic Basin additions over five years, increasing competing refinery feedstock and inventory availability while reducing Brent's dependence on Gulf recovery. (corporate.exxonmobil.com) |
| Vehicle Turnover Erodes Gasoline Demand | Substitution And Technology | -10% | +3.0% | Electrification removes recurring fuel purchases, not merely one year's demand growth. IEA's Global EV Outlook 2026 projects oil displacement rising from about 1.7 mb/d in 2025 to 5 mb/d in 2030; the incremental displacement is about 3.3 mb/d, not five. I assign 90% likelihood to further substitution, which lowers refinery crude requirements and raises potential inventories unless producers withdraw supply. (iea.org) |
| Petrochemicals LEAK Growth TO GAS | Substitution And Technology | -5.0% | +1.0% | Headline liquids growth overstates the corresponding call on Brent when petrochemical plants consume ethane and LPG instead of refinery naphtha. IEA's Oil 2025 projected 2.3 mb/d of additional NGL supply through 2030, not equivalent crude spare capacity. I assign 85% likelihood to continued feedstock competition, which shifts demand away from refinery barrels and leaves more crude available for storage despite expanding plastics consumption. (iea.org) |
3.2. Risks & Opportunities
Plausible downside scenarios
Tail Risks
Less likely downside scenarios that could materially hurt the outcome if they occur.
Scroll to view all columns
| Tail scenario | Chance of Occurring | Commodity Price Impact | Why plausible / what changes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Credit Break Meets Returning Barrels | 30% | -30% | A synchronized recession becomes dangerous if it coincides with restored Gulf exports in 2027–28. A credit contraction that cuts global oil consumption by at least 2 mb/d year over year would overwhelm refiners' demand just as shut-in production returns, forcing visible inventory accumulation and aggressive spot discounts relative to the contemporaneous base. I assign 30% probability because the scenario requires both a broad demand shock and poorly timed supply recovery; policy support could otherwise cushion consumption. |
| Quota Rupture Floods Export Markets | 25% | -25% | A formal breakdown of Saudi-led restraint during 2027–29 could turn spare capacity into an export contest. The trigger would be several major producers announcing and delivering at least 3 mb/d of combined increases within six months, beyond base-case normalization and ordinary quota adjustments. Inventories would build faster than demand could absorb them, forcing Brent below the contemporaneous base; I assign 25% probability because sustained revenue destruction gives producers strong incentives to renegotiate. |
Plausible upside scenarios
Tail Opportunities
Less likely upside scenarios that could materially improve the outcome if they occur.
Scroll to view all columns
| Tail scenario | Chance of Occurring | Commodity Price Impact | Why plausible / what changes |
|---|---|---|---|
| GULF Damage Becomes Structural | 30% | +45% | A new coordinated strike that disables major Gulf processing plants and bypass terminals during 2026–28 could convert temporary shut-ins into structural capacity losses. The scenario requires at least 3 mb/d remaining unavailable for more than twelve months after initial repairs, forcing refiners to bid for scarce Atlantic cargoes and deplete buffers further. Its 30% probability reflects the demanding combination of fresh damage and prolonged reconstruction; the uplift is relative to the contemporaneous base price. |
| Replacement Investment Falls OFF Cliff | 20% | +35% | A financing shock in 2028–29 could cancel a concentrated wave of replacement projects just as mature production declines. The trigger is two consecutive years of real upstream spending cuts exceeding 20%, followed by verified project deferrals sufficient to remove roughly 2 mb/d of expected 2030–31 supply. Inventories would tighten after the initial demand shock fades. I assign 20% probability because high prices, national producers and shorter-cycle drilling could prevent the investment gap from persisting. |
5. References & Context
Search behavior, retained evidence, supplied context, and response token details.External web search was used. The retained search terms and consulted sources are shown below.
Context supplied to the model
Public-safe inputs retained with this immutable forecast publication.
- 01
Market data
inmemory_base_placeholders__latest_eod_close_price_with_stats__var2
- 02
Global context in this run
Used
- 03
Fundamental data in this run
Not used
- 04
Global context
Standard global market and cross-asset context
- 05
Subject context
Commodity subject and market context
- 06
Task framework
Standard investment-forecast task guidelines
- 07
Advisor framework
Universal Investor The Polymath
- 08
Forecast output requested
Commodity Extended Investment Thesis (4 Quadrants and Alpha Asymmetry) + Pct Change Timeseries for Close Price with Rationale, (5Y Quarterly)
Global context snapshot
2026 Year-to-Date Global Market and World-Events Context Through September 20
Download Archived SnapshotCoverage 2026-01-01 to 2026-09-20 · Knowledge cutoff 2026-09-20
January 1-September 20, 2026: monetary tightening, energy security, trade restrictions, AI financing and divergent growth; five leading market themes.
Fed raised rates to 3.75%-4.00%; ECB hike is in force and BOJ increase starts September 24. Markets through September 18, bitcoin through September 19.
| Top 3 Market Shifts From File | Date | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Renewed monetary tightening amid persistent inflation | 2026-01-30 | ACTIVE POLICY REGIME |
| Iran/Hormuz conflict and wider energy-security disruption | 2026-02-28 | ONGOING |
| Tariff legal reset and strategic supply restrictions | 2026-02-20 | ACTIVE POLICY REGIME |
Representative Sources of the Context File
And more sources from the retained context package.
Fundamental context
annual: 0 periods; quarterly: 0 periods
Currencies cited: USD (quote USD).
Search terms retained
- 1.site.iea.org Oil 2025 2030 production capacity demand 114.7 105.5
- 2.site.iea.org oil market report September 2026
- 3.site.iea.org 2025 oil gas observed decline rates investment 8 percent
- 4.site.opec.org World Oil Outlook 2025 2030 oil demand 113
- 5.site.iea.org Oil 2026 executive summary 2031 demand capacity
- 6.site.opec.org September 2026 monthly oil market report demand 2027
Sources retained for this advisor
- [1]Executive summary – The Implications of Oil and Gas Field Decline Rates – Analysis - IEAiea.org
- [2]Executive summary – Oil 2025 – Analysis - IEAiea.org
- [3]Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countriesopec.org
- [4]https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/steo/archives/sep26.pdfeia.gov
- [5]Oil Market Report - September 2026 – Analysis - IEAiea.org
- [6]Daily oil production hits 900,000 barrels in Guyana's Stabroek block | ExxonMobil Guyanacorporate.exxonmobil.com
- [7]Executive summary – Global EV Outlook 2026 – Analysis - IEAiea.org
- [8]Federal Reserve Board - Federal Reserve issues FOMC statementfederalreserve.gov
- [9]Executive summary – Key Questions on Energy and AI – Analysis - IEAiea.org
- [10]Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countriesopec.org
Original published forecast
Inspect the original revision and sealed receipt when a public record is available. Integrity verification is separate from forecast accuracy.
Consensus Investment Thesis
Consensus Thesis Takeaway
Shared synthesis across the 14 advisor forecasts in this analysis.
Spot crude trades at a substantial geopolitical and logistics premium over long-run replacement economics. While maritime interdictions and damaged pipeline infrastructure currently constrain deliverable supply, underlying wellhead balances are shifting toward expansion. Low-cost deepwater capacity across South America and unconventional US basins will progressively saturate Atlantic refiners, while restrictive monetary policy elevates inventory carrying costs and curtails industrial consumption. Valuation sensitivity remains anchored to the marginal extraction cost curve, where deepwater and shale additions establish equilibrium between sixty-five and seventy-two dollars. The primary counterargument posits that cascading infrastructure damage could permanently strand Persian Gulf crude, but engineering workarounds and commercial storage buffers indicate normalization will outpace demand recovery.
- Disrupted Gulf volumes represent geographically imprisoned spare capacity rather than permanent depletion, ensuring rapid supply relief once maritime transit stabilizes.
- Cumulative global inventory deficits exceeding four hundred million barrels guarantee a multi-quarter restocking bid that prevents an instantaneous, chaotic price collapse.
- Expanding petrochemical feedstock requirements across non-OECD Asia provide an essential physical floor that partially offsets developed-market transport fuel electrification.
Advisor Disagreement
Where the Advisors Differ
The decisive analytical debate across reports concerns the persistence of the current geopolitical risk premium versus the arrival speed of structural supply surpluses. Bullish interpretations argue that damaged Gulf logistics and depleted global inventories will sustain backwardation well into late 2027, treating spare capacity as functionally inaccessible. Conversely, bearish models assert that logistical adaptations, such as Aramco's pipeline bypasses, are already deflating the crisis premium faster than anticipated. Resolving this tension requires tracking prompt twelve-month timespreads and observing whether OECD commercial storage begins seasonally adjusted builds during the first half of 2027.
Behind the synthesis
How each opinion shapes the consensus
The common pattern across reports is that current triple-digit spot valuations reflect transient geopolitical friction and shipping chokepoint dislocations rather than irreversible physical depletion. Reports consistently document incoming non-OPEC deepwater capacity from South America and US basins alongside monetary drag. However, correlated assumptions emerge regarding the speed of fleet electrification, where several perspectives assume immediate OECD road-fuel collapse. The strongest credible contrarian argument emphasizes that severe inventory draws exceeding four hundred million barrels require prolonged replenishment, preventing an instantaneous price collapse. The primary unsupported claim is that technological substitution can eliminate refinery intake within two years regardless of emerging Asian industrial baseload growth. Weights are therefore concentrated in analyses that ground their trajectories in empirical inventory balances, verified pipeline throughput data, and observable futures forward-curve economics, while discounting perspectives that extrapolate rapid demand destruction without addressing supply replacement costs.
Universal Investor AI
The Polymath
GPT-6 AstraDemonstrates outstanding empirical rigor, anchoring its thesis in authoritative inventory drawdown data, explicit forward-curve carry costs, and realistic post-repair normalization schedules. Its disciplined focus on risk asymmetry justifies the highest relative allocation.
Universal Investor AI
The Polymath
Opus 5Exhibits superior empirical verification, citing concrete pipeline bypass throughput, forward futures strip pricing, and inventory deficit statistics. Its identification of imprisoned rather than permanently lost capacity delivers critical analytical clarity.
Warren Buffett AI
The Value Seeker
Gemini 3.8 FlashPresents an incisive full-cycle sustaining cost assessment, correctly diagnosing the lack of an economic margin of safety at current levels. Its valuation framework provides a strong, grounded anchor for terminal equilibrium pricing.
J.P. Morgan AI
The Titan
Gemini 3.8 FlashFeatures rigorous institutional analysis of monetary policy transmission, working capital carry costs, and commercial inventory dynamics. The causal link between interest rate friction and physical destocking is exceptionally well articulated and consistent.
Ray Dalio AI
The Strategist
Gemini 3.8 FlashIntegrates macroeconomic liquidity constraints, sovereign credit transmission, and short-term debt cycle dynamics into physical commodity pricing. Its systemic approach to refining demand destruction provides vital analytical diversification.
Superintelligence AI
The Anthropologist
Gemini 3.8 FlashPresents a balanced synthesis of logistics normalization, deepwater offshore expansions, and emerging market industrial demand baseloads. The underlying causal linkages are logically coherent and well-supported across intermediate forecast quarters.
Universal Investor AI
The Polymath
Gemini 3.8 FlashProvides a coherent synthesis of logistical rerouting and cost-curve equilibrium. While sound in identifying non-OPEC volume additions, its reliance on generic depletion estimates without detailed balance-sheet verification warrants a moderate baseline weighting.
Explore every advisor’s contribution
You’re viewing 7 of 14 advisor weights. Sign in to check access to all explanations, complete advisor reports and comparisons.